{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1038\cocoasubrtf360
{\fonttbl\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Helvetica;}
{\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;}
\paperw11900\paperh16840\margl1440\margr1440\vieww9000\viewh8400\viewkind0
\pard\tx566\tx1133\tx1700\tx2267\tx2834\tx3401\tx3968\tx4535\tx5102\tx5669\tx6236\tx6803\ql\qnatural\pardirnatural

\f0\fs24 \cf0 Britain's election system "archaic"\
\
A report by Britain's Electoral Reform Society finds that the May general election was the most disproportionate in history.  Under a list - based system of proportional representation, as used in elections to the European parliament, the outcome would have been very different\
--------------------------------------------------------------\
ALL SEATS WON (May 7 election) \
\
First - past - the - post method\
\
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350\
\
Conservative 331 Labour 232 1 UKIP 8 Lib Dem 56 SNP  1 Green other 21\
\
Across all parties, 331 of 650 MPs were elected on under 50% of vote, and 191 with less than 30% of vote\
--------------------------------------------------------------\
PARTY LIST SYSTEM\
\
Proportional representation \
\
242 208 80 47 30 20 23\
\
European parliament uses D'Hondt method, that allocates seats in proportion to parties' share of vote\
\
UK's First - past - the - post method sees candidate with highest number of votes, but not necessarily majority of electorate, elected\
-------------------------------------------------------------------\
Source: Electoral Reform Society\
\
words 158\
\
\
\
\
}